#Outlook 2016 cannot send to recepient pro
#Outlook 2016 cannot send to recepient windows
Snap! Lapsus$, Excel RAT, Honda Hackers, Lunar Landers, Windows Easter Egg Spiceworks Originals.In both cases we've managed to get around the message being bounced back, by manually typing the email address, which is fair enough but just seems rather daft all-in-all when you there are quicker ways to get an email address to start a new mail directly.Ĭan anyone explain why this is happenning or what i could possibly do to prevent this so Outlook/Exchange behaves as intuitively as it makes out you can? Thanks chaps! i don't think he peformed the exact steps as above, but may have just copied the email address from another email's fwded contacts.
Upon first clicking the hyperlink the To: field in the new email displayed this: [mailto: and after a brief moment the To field corrects itself to just the email address Very quickly after sending the email he gets the email bounced back with the above message.Īnother user has complained of something similiar happening, with the exact same bounce back message.
It seems users get this message when they've started a new email directly from using an address in another email.įor example, one user today was forwarded an email and he then wanted to send one of the other recipients an email directly so he clicked on the email address hyperlink from that email to start a new email. We're running Exchange 2003 as our mail server and we have Outlook 2003/2007 around the office. The following recipient(s) cannot be on 10:07 You need to turn on Cached Exchange Mode in Outlook (click file tab, account settings, account settings, email tab, click change and under Microsoft exchange server check Use cached exchange mode. Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Send to mail recipient not working from GP reports. Subject: Undeliverable: Cheese Nibblets, Cheddar. We've had a couple of instances of this message the past few weeks, different users to different email addresses, which is slightly bewildering: